Stealing yard signs?!?!?

I know that stealing political signs is nothing new.  When my supporters reported signs stolen in 2004, I found it was Republicans who’d been stealing my signs…and I was a Republican candidate then! 

So it shouldn’t surprise me that the same people are stealing my Libertarian-campaign signs now.

I’m not surprised.  I’m disgusted.

But I really like the response shown below.  Thank you, Mrs. Q; that lifted my spirits.

 

Excellent response

Excellent response

 

What’s the choice here?

A good part of any “major” party (meaning “entrenched and corrupt”) campaign is hurling and repulsing the attack that “corporate money” or “out of state contributors” have bought off the candidate.  Fair enough; we all know the problem of money in politics.  Yet politicians know that’s what we vote for, so they take the money and run anyway.  And sure enough, we vote for them anyway.

OK, that’s what we want, apparently.  We do vote for it over and over and over and over….

But especially irritating to me personally, is when journalists hurl the “not enough money to be competitive” grenade.  So a good part of any “third party” campaign is wasted trying to gain the imprimatur of legitimacy offered by all that we hate about politics. 

We try to tell voters we “mean to win” when elections aren’t even about candidates; they’re about voters.  We try to raise money in order to get the “free media” exposure obtained by attaching corrupting strings to the candidate.  We try to become, in other words, just like the fancy pants parties so that we’ll be treated to the same respect and electoral success as those evil monstrosities.

What in the world is that all about?  Are we to feign upset about the obscene, corrupting money in campaigns, and then wallow in it, and point to the pathetic challengers who “can’t raise enough money?”  Are we to demand a truly level playing field …in which all campaigns are corrupt from the start?

Or, could we perhaps undergo the long-due epiphany that the playing field is not at all level, and that the candidates who should enjoy the greatest advantage are those without strings attached, who stand for something, and who are actually candidates for public service, not Caesars in waiting.

Remember, the corporate giants who contribute to Big Party campaigns expect, and get, special deals for their investments.  Ordinary folks who contribute to Big Party campaigns probably don’t know how much of their tax money already goes to these parties, and have believed what they’ve been told about “reality,” “pragmatism” and their “wasted vote.”

Who, on the other hand, is willing to pay for a level playing field?  Who will reach into their own wallets and/or time to do what is right, as opposed to “playing the game?”

In all the years I’ve been watching, I’ve seen only one candidate who is worth more than a puddle of spit raise “enough money to be competitive,” and that is Ron Paul.  In my lifetime (50 years and counting), he’s the first guy to actually stand for something and raise huge stacks of cash.

It could be that others, like me, are just lousy at fundraising.  OK, that’s a distinct possibility.

But if people who stand for constitutions possess an unfortunate, perhaps genetic inability to raise money, what would you rather have?  An evil dictator who knows how to campaign, or a great public servant who just can’t put on a show like that?  Would you prefer a great politician/ bad candidate, or a great candidate/ deadly politician? 

Well, think about an analog in any other area of life.  If you need a delicate, life-saving surgery, would you prefer a skilled surgeon who may have a speech impediment, but has a brilliant surgucal success record; or would you choose a handsome actor who can’t hold a scalpel, but delivers inspiring lines with poise and pathos?

Is this really that hard?

Once again, the choice is yours.

 

 

There is no free lunch.

The good news is that there are enough liberty and justice loving patriots out there to take back our rights and leash politicians to the constitutions again.  And these patriots have enough money and votes to do it in one single election cycle.  …Overwhelming victory.  …All at once.

The bad news is that they’ve been sitting on their money and wasting their votes.

You get what you pay for.  There’s no free lunch.  You get what you vote for; there’s no excuse.

There are plenty of people who pay big money for political favors and twisted laws.  Special deals for special people.  You pay-to-play.  Those with the gold make the rules.  Right? 

But who is willing to pay for a fair deal?  How many will sacrifice their time and money without any expectation of reciprocal favors?  Who, in other words, will actually oppose injustice and failure?

It’s the simplest math to see why taxation, litigation and regulation are growing like bacteria.  Evil reigns when good people sit on their wallets.  

I’m running for Governor of Indiana because the Governor has only one legitimate job – to execute the laws of the state.  And the laws of Indiana are based solely on the authority of the Constitution of Indiana, a contract I have actually read.  Repeatedly.  I know what it says, and I know what life would be like if only we enforced its restrictions on politicians.

Life would be sweet.  Life would work.  We’d have the prosperity, opportunity, security and liberty due to us by law.  Cheap, plentiful healthcare, unequalled education, unregulated success and happiness are our legal rights.

Yet I am the only gubernatorial candidate who wants this for you.  Only I would actually keep the oath of office to support both the constitutions of Indiana and the United States of America as is constitutionally required. 

Read the constitution yourself.  It’s on my website (it’s my Platform), and I’ve excerpted key parts in the following pages.  Read it.  Then decide how much it’s worth to you to get it back.   

Make checks payable to: Horning for Congress, 7851 Pleasant Hill Road, Freedom, IN 47431.