Declaration of Independence revisited

Let us refresh our understanding of what Independence Day is all about, OK?  What follows is the Declaration of Independence, in black, with my comments in red.

When (Not if…When.  It is human nature to fail) in the course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands (The British Constitution was not written law; the bands were tradition and heredity.  And the British were breaking the traditions and violating the rights) which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the laws of nature and of nature’s God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.

We hold these truths to be self-evident:

That all men are created equal (and there were many founders who believed that, in spite of slavery.  But this is mostly about sovereignty); that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights; that among these are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness (this famous phrase is borrowed from John Locke and George Mason.  Mason was the first to pen a written constitution and a written Declaration of Rights.  He, more than anybody, is owed gratitude for much of at least my concept of liberty and justice); that, to secure these rights, governments are instituted among men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed; that whenever any form of government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the right of the people to alter or to abolish it (read the preceding words over again; this part says it all), and to institute new government, laying its foundation on such principles, and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their safety and happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shown that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed (It’s easy to see that we’re gradually enduring more injustice; when will we say “enough?”). But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same object, evinces a design to reduce them under absolute despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such government, and to provide new guards for their future security (It is our DUTY to throw off such government.  Pay close attention to the itemized complaints that follow).  Such has been the patient sufferance of these colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former systems of government. The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute tyranny over these states. To prove this, let facts be submitted to a candid world.

He has refused his assent to laws, the most wholesome and necessary for the public good. (Our “federal” government routinely overturns state laws.  This is unconstitutional.)

He has forbidden his governors to pass laws of immediate and pressing importance, unless suspended in their operation till his assent should be obtained; and, when so suspended, he has utterly neglected to attend to them. (Ditto the above)

He has refused to pass other laws for the accommodation of large districts of people, unless those people would relinquish the right of representation in the legislature, a right inestimable to them, and formidable to tyrants only. (King George refused to allow the colonies the authority to pass their own laws, but also denied them representation in parliament)

He has called together legislative bodies at places unusual uncomfortable, and distant from the depository of their public records, for the sole purpose of fatiguing them into compliance with his measures. (Does this sound like the secret, remote meetings that end up costing us our homes and jobs with eminent domain and unjust taxation?)

He has dissolved representative houses repeatedly, for opposing, with manly firmness, his invasions on the rights of the people. (In our case, the “feds” don’t dissolve congresses, they are either denied proper jurisdiction, or completely overturned in effect)

He has refused for a long time, after such dissolutions, to cause others to be elected; whereby the legislative powers, incapable of annihilation, have returned to the people at large for their exercise; the state remaining, in the mean time, exposed to all the dangers of invasions from without and convulsions within. (More Americans are killed each year by illegal immigrants than the total killed in Iraq so far.  And states who try to do something about this are overruled)

He has endeavored to prevent the population of these states; for that purpose obstructing the laws for naturalization of foreigners; refusing to pass others to encourage their migration hither, and raising the conditions of new appropriations of lands.

He has obstructed the administration of justice, by refusing his assent to laws for establishing judiciary powers.

He has made judges dependent on his will alone, for the tenure of their offices, and the amount and payment of their salaries. (Our US Congress has the authority to impeach justices, deny jurisdiction and even dissolve courts; but has never used it)

He has erected a multitude of new offices, and sent hither swarms of officers to harass our people and eat out their substance.  (Oh my…the colonists had no idea how bad things would get in this regard.  We now have the biggest, costliest bureaucracy of all time)

He has kept among us, in times of peace, standing armies, without the consent of our legislatures.  (Our constitutions were never amended to allow the standing armies and continual, undeclared wars we’ve suffered.  Our state militias have been dissolved into a “National Guard” without any legal or moral basis)

He has affected to render the military independent of, and superior to, the civil power. (Of course.  This always happens)

He has combined with others to subject us to a jurisdiction foreign to our Constitution and unacknowledged by our laws, giving his assent to their acts of pretended legislation: (Think UN, NAFTA, etc.)

For quartering large bodies of armed troops among us;

For protecting them, by a mock trial, from punishment for any murders which they should commit on the inhabitants of these states;

For cutting off our trade with all parts of the world;

For imposing taxes on us without our consent;

For depriving us, in many cases, of the benefits of trial by jury; (All the preceding happens now)

For transporting us beyond seas, to be tried for pretended offenses;

For abolishing the free system of English laws in a neighboring province, establishing therein an arbitrary government, and enlarging its boundaries, so as to render it at once an example and fit instrument for introducing the same absolute rule into these colonies;

For taking away our charters, abolishing our most valuable laws, and altering fundamentally the forms of our governments; (Ditto the previous comment)

For suspending our own legislatures, and declaring themselves invested with power to legislate for us in all cases whatsoever. (Ditto)

He has abdicated government here, by declaring us out of his protection and waging war against us.

He has plundered our seas, ravaged our coasts, burned our towns, and destroyed the lives of our people.

He is at this time transporting large armies of foreign mercenaries to complete the works of death, desolation, and tyranny already begun with circumstances of cruelty and perfidy scarcely paralleled in the most barbarous ages, and totally unworthy the head of a civilized nation.

He has constrained our fellow-citizens, taken captive on the high seas, to bear arms against their country, to become the executioners of their friends and brethren, or to fall themselves by their hands. (I will not pretend that we are under the gun as were the colonists.  But don’t assume it can’t/won’t happen here.  This is the pattern of human history and fallen civilizations, that lost liberty turns to oppression which turns to destruction)

He has excited domestic insurrection among us, and has endeavored to bring on the inhabitants of our frontiers the merciless Indian savages, whose known rule of warfare is an undistinguished destruction of all ages, sexes, and conditions.

In every stage of these oppressions we have petitioned for redress in the most humble terms; our repeated petitions have been answered only by repeated injury. A prince, whose character is thus marked by every act which may define a tyrant, is unfit to be the ruler of a free people.

Nor have we been wanting in our attentions to our British brethren. We have warned them, from time to time, of attempts by their legislature to extend an unwarrantable jurisdiction over us. We have reminded them of the circumstances of our emigration and settlement here. We have appealed to their native justice and magnanimity; and we have conjured them, by the ties of our common kindred, to disavow these usurpations which would inevitably interrupt our connections and correspondence. They too, have been deaf to the voice of justice and of consanguinity. We must, therefore, acquiesce in the necessity which denounces our separation, and hold them as we hold the rest of mankind, enemies in war, in peace friends.

We, therefore, the representatives of the United States of America, in General Congress assembled, appealing to the Supreme Judge of the world for the rectitude of our intentions, do, in the name and by the authority of the good people of these colonies solemnly publish and declare, That these United Colonies are, and of right ought to be, FREE AND INDEPENDENT STATES; that they are absolved from all allegiance to the British crown and that all political connection between them and the state of Great Britain is, and ought to be, totally dissolved; and that, as free and independent states, they have full power to levy war, conclude peace, contract alliances, establish commerce, and do all other acts and things which independent states may of right do. And for the support of this declaration, with a firm reliance on the protection of Divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our lives, our fortunes, and our sacred honor.

Read all the foundational documents you can; particularly those written by the so-called “anti-federalists” (they called themselves Republicans, while the so-called “federalists” were actually royalists and nationalists).  You’ll see an entirely different picture of state and individual sovereignty than you’re taught in government schools.

States are legally sovereign, and the truly federal government has very little authority.  The law is far different from the practice.  Please read the laws.  Know your rights as written.  There is no shortcut.  There is no other way (except as God could provide a miracle).

We are headed toward last-chapter history and our politicians will not save us from it. 

Choose wisely.

Advertisements

The URI to TrackBack this entry is: https://wedeclare.wordpress.com/2008/07/02/declaration-of-independence-revisited/trackback/

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: