Rule Of Law Citizen Tribunal

This is not a blog.  It is an addendum to all my previous blogs.  So my statement that I won’t blog anymore still stands, OK?  OK. 

This is just a proposal that I should’ve made long ago…OK?  OK.

Constitutional Tribunal of 2009

For generations now, Americans have known about our government’s growing string of lawbreaking and abuse of power.  Somehow, we have rationalized and abstracted it such that it doesn’t bother us.  This must be the “frog in the cook pot” scenario by which life is slowly, but strangely tolerably boiled away.

Over the years I’ve found few people who have demonstrated any interest in jumping out of the pot.  Sure, many will accurately describe our impending doom, but they then stubbornly refuse accountability for their predicament, and they do nothing to solve it.  This wouldn’t be such a problem if it weren’t for the fact that they’re getting us all boiled. 

It’s perhaps understandable that from the inside of this boiling pot of collective madness, I’ve not always seen things so clearly myself.  I’d never read any constitution until I was thirty.  I was forty when I first read the Indiana Constitution.  I’ve had varying types and degrees of “AHA!” moments and epiphanies ever since.

Perhaps I’ve just had another.  I hope so.

You’ve no doubt seen that the world loves a trial.  Whether it’s OJ, Perry Mason or Judge Judy, we seem to become transfixed by legal battles.  As you know, our government is fond of “tribunals” when regular courts just don’t fit the objectives.   And if you’ve ever tried to fight our government, you know that existing “courts of law” are anything but legitimate courts of law.

Well, we have the makings of what should be the greatest legal battle of all time – citizens against their own Golem.  The nation that started with a legal/political argument against an oppressive regime (Declaration of Independence against crazy King George) has actually been gone for decades, we now have the opportunity to peacefully create the dream that our founders never fully realized – a nation where every citizen has inalienable rights, and where the foul-tempered pit-bull we call government stays behind a fence of laws.

I’ve come to believe that we should immediately convene a Constitutional Tribunal.

We should assemble the best minds of our movement to serve as a judicial panel. 

We should gather our best arguments. 

We should employ all means possible to promulgate our findings (blogs, conventional media/press conferences-releases, social networking, twitter) to the general public.

We should invite our rulers to rebut.

We should publicly convict and sentence our rulers…and ourselves as their masters, as I am certain that we will find that we’ve all broken the law, turned on the flame, and jumped into the pot.

I’ve started arguments many times over many years; for instance HERE, HERE and HERE, and, of course, HERE.  But we need to make use of our best brains and technology to make a coherent case in the form of a public trial…a public movement on behalf of the proven, already-law, best-ever-compromises, world-renowned Rule of Law under our state and federal constitutions.

The URI to TrackBack this entry is: http://wedeclare.wordpress.com/2009/05/14/rule-of-law-citizen-tribunal/trackback/

RSS feed for comments on this post.

12 Comments Leave a comment.

  1. What is a Constitutional Tribunal? You have my interest.

  2. okay, some fuel for the fire, and you got me on fire again (although much more tempered by the spirit…:)). US Code 18, sections 241 and 242.

    http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode18/usc_sec_18_00000241—-000-.html

    Because of ‘Sovereign immunity’ any elected or appointed official must be brought to trial ‘by name’ for ’specific’ violations. This should not be difficult because violations are numerous and most all of them are guilty anyway…

    Give me a clear vision of what you have in mind and I will work on getting the next tea party on the same page with you…:)

  3. “When once a republic is corrupted, there is no possibility of remedying any of the growing evils but by removing the corruption and restoring its lost principles; every other correction is either useless or a new evil” – Thomas Jefferson

    The corruption of our republic starts with us as a people, the government corruption is a reflection of the corruption of we the people.

    “When my people repent and seek my face and turn from thier wicked ways, then I will heal thier land.”

    “Repent for the Kingdom of heaven is at hand.”

    We are facing a Constitutional crisis because of the rapant wickedness of we the people. GOD is wroth with this nation, lest we all repent, we are all doomed.

    It rains on the just as well as the unjust… case in point, frost advisory overnight. Cover your plants!

  4. There is no authority for sovereign immunity in any state or federal constitution. Forget unconstitutional statutes…nobody’s above the law. That is the very definition of Rule Of Law.

  5. You are correct about sovereign immunity. There is no authority granted by either Federal or State Constitution for sovereign immunity. I need to stay away from Wikipedia.

  6. Andy,
    I’ve been searching both federal and state constitutions for specifics regarding the authority of a county sheriff to supersede all other law enforcement entities. The word repeated so often is that the sheriff may rightfully demand any other individual attempting to assert such action to vacate the confines of the county for which the sheriff has supreme authority. I’ve not been able to locate any text/verbiage to this effect in either constitution.

    What say ye?

    Bob

  7. Bob, this is an area of tradition that has unfortunately wound up very confused in our lawless nation.
    I can’t detail this here because it’s a long, complex story. But basically, there’s a little truth to the sheriff’s unwritten power in a traditional sense; but since we have SO MANY NEW “law enforcement” entities – almost entirely unconstitutional ones – the tradition now smacks into a different reality than existed 150 years ago.
    Nobody has ever had supreme authority…all authority, by law, comes from written constitutions. Authority not granted is denied.
    The areas of grantable power authorized by constitutions to the legislature are actually pretty vast, and sheriffs and other local/sub-state powers actually fall in this domain.
    So legislation relative to sheriffs and other local agents of power are not inherently unconstitutional, even in granting pretty amazing powers (short of denying us our rights, of course).
    But almost everything our government does is unconstitutional these days. And I’m not aware of any recent legislation that doesn’t at least in some way run afoul of the constitutions as written.

  8. Thanks, Andy. I guess the closest I can come to finding something specific in this respect is:
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bLJgPuNAh60

    I think you’re right about finding the fortitude among compatriots stronger in Texas than elsewhere. We wish you all the best.

  9. Regrettably, Napolitano appears to be creating a huge potential for confrontation between local constabulary and federal agents (and the public, in general)!

    B.

  10. AND OUR MILITARY!!!

  11. Yes, Bob; I’m very much worried about our various armed forces…both as opposed to citizens and against politics. I’m hoping the Oath Keepers make a movement, and I hope we citizens will get off our duffs.

  12. Support your local Sheriff. Janet Napolitano made a tremendous error with the DHS report. That document made me ill. The Thomas More Law Center is taking her to task for it.

    http://www.thomasmore.org/default-sb_thomasmore.html?704945518

    sadly, I could not open any of the .pdf’s on this case within this site. Hopefully they can have her shorts flying on a flagpole!

    Also, Oath-keepers…GOD bless every single one of them!


Leave a Comment